[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/VPMU: No need to check whether VPMU quirk is needed on Intel
We only support family 6 so quirk handling is always needed. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c | 18 +----------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c index a267a3c..86d390f 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c @@ -106,24 +106,11 @@ static const unsigned int regs_off = * 1 (or another value != 0) into it. * There exist no errata and the real cause of this behaviour is unknown. */ -bool_t __read_mostly is_pmc_quirk; - -static void check_pmc_quirk(void) -{ - if ( current_cpu_data.x86 == 6 ) - is_pmc_quirk = 1; - else - is_pmc_quirk = 0; -} - static void handle_pmc_quirk(u64 msr_content) { int i; u64 val; - if ( !is_pmc_quirk ) - return; - val = msr_content; for ( i = 0; i < arch_pmc_cnt; i++ ) { @@ -812,8 +799,7 @@ static int core2_vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) rdmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, msr_content); if ( msr_content ) { - if ( is_pmc_quirk ) - handle_pmc_quirk(msr_content); + handle_pmc_quirk(msr_content); core2_vpmu_cxt->global_status |= msr_content; msr_content = 0xC000000700000000 | ((1 << arch_pmc_cnt) - 1); wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, msr_content); @@ -998,8 +984,6 @@ int __init core2_vpmu_init(void) sizeof(uint64_t) * fixed_pmc_cnt + sizeof(struct xen_pmu_cntr_pair) * arch_pmc_cnt; - check_pmc_quirk(); - if ( sizeof(struct xen_pmu_data) + sizeof(uint64_t) * fixed_pmc_cnt + sizeof(struct xen_pmu_cntr_pair) * arch_pmc_cnt > PAGE_SIZE ) { -- 1.8.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |