[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2] evtchn: don't reuse ports that are still "busy"

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:57:03 +0000
Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:57:11 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 01/12/15 15:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> I realize there's a lot of u32-s for port numbers, but I think we
> should really get used to using evtchn_port_t for those.

I checked the type in struct evtchn (which is u32) but evtchn_port_t is
better.

Thanks.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2] evtchn: don't reuse ports that are still "busy"
  - From: David Vrabel
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2] evtchn: don't reuse ports that are still "busy"
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Hotplugged devices in Xen 4.5 and domain reboot
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Build problems with xen 4.7
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2] evtchn: don't reuse ports that are still "busy"
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen/arm: p2m: Add support to remove empty translation table
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.