[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] 9p file system for xen
On 12/1/2015 7:46 AM, Wei Liu wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 07:37:43AM -0700, Linda wrote:On 12/1/2015 4:47 AM, Wei Liu wrote:On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:19:18PM -0500, Neil Sikka wrote:Hi Wei, could you please explain why/how you would have done the project differently now and why these patches are not "good"? From my conversation with Linda, I understood that her code is "Independent of virtio except the 9pvirtio specific code, which is used extensively."I need to implement a xen transport for 9pfs. Linda was essentially doing the same. But she didn't specify the canonical protocol between frontend and backend.For my own edification: In the interests of the limited time of my internship, we decided I shouldn't do the initialization using the xen toolstack. Were there are other expediencies that I'm unaware of?It's not about toolstack. Toolstack merely sets up xenstore nodes according to the protocol.I tried to follow the xen handshaking protocol between front and back end at startup.Yes, that's the right direction. Following existing convention is good enough for an intern project. Specifying the protocol in detailed is not the requirement for a prototype. But in the end to upstream xen-9pfs a canonical protocol is required. A blessed version of protocol needs to be committed to xen.git tree. We have a bunch of those in xen.git/xen/include/public/io/ directory. Wei. Thank you. L Thanks. LindaAs for "9pvirtio specific code", I think there is misunderstanding because though a lot of files in QEMU are prefixed with virtio they are actually not specific to virtio at all. I think the "independent of virtio ..." part was referring to the new transport she wrote. Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |