[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/VPMU: No need to check whether VPMU quirk is needed on Intel

To: "Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 06:07:11 -0700
Cc: andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:07:44 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 30.11.15 at 19:38, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We only support family 6 so quirk handling is always needed.

Is that indeed the case for even the most modern CPUs?

In any event, Intel folks should be copied here too.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/VPMU: Support only versions 2 and 3 of architectural performance monitoring
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Emulating in response of an int3 vm_event
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/VPMU: Support only versions 2 and 3 of architectural performance monitoring
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Build problems with xen 4.7
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.