Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] xen/save: pass a size parameter to the HVM compat functions

[Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

El 24/11/15 a les 14.06, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
>>>> On 24.11.15 at 13:54, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> El 20/11/15 a les 16.37, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
>>>>>> On 18.11.15 at 17:37, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/hvm/save.h
>>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/hvm/save.h
>>>> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ void _hvm_read_entry(struct hvm_domain_context *h,
>>>>   */
>>>>  #define _hvm_load_entry(_x, _h, _dst, _strict) ({                       \
>>>>      int r;                                                              \
>>>> +    struct hvm_save_descriptor *d                                       \
>>>> +        = (struct hvm_save_descriptor *)&(_h)->data[(_h)->cur];         \
>>>
>>> This would seem to belong in the else if() body below. Also I
>>> don't think "d" is a suitable name for a variable inside a macro
>>> (albeit the same would apply to "r" too).
>>
>> Patch #2 makes use of "d" in the first "if" branch also. I don't think
>> it makes much sense to put it inside of the "else if" branch if I have
>> to move it in the following patch.
> 
> Yes, I saw that, and while you could move in patch 2 I agree it
> doesn't make much sense.
> 
>> Regarding the name, I don't have a strong opinion, desc is more
>> descriptive, but it's also longer which means I might have to break some
>> lines inside of the macro even more.
> 
> At least d_ perhaps then?

I've called it "desc", I hope it's fine.

Roger.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel