[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 38/62] arm/acpi: Add placeholder for efi and acpi load address
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Shannon Zhao wrote: > On 2015/11/17 19:58, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi Shannon, > > > > On 17/11/15 09:40, shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> EFI table, memory description table and some of acpi tables will be > >> placed after DOM0 memory space. Add placeholder for the starting address > >> for loading in DOM0 and the size of new added tables. Also add a > >> placeholder to store the new created tables. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 5 +++++ > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > >> index 1e61f30..91272e5 100644 > >> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > >> @@ -125,6 +125,11 @@ struct arch_domain > >> } vuart; > >> > >> unsigned int evtchn_irq; > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > >> + void *efi_acpi_table; > >> + paddr_t efi_acpi_gpa; > >> + paddr_t efi_acpi_len; > >> +#endif > > > > Why do you need this in the arch_domain? AFAICT those 3 variables should > > only be used while building DOM0, so a better place would be in struct > > kernel_info (see xen/arch/arm/kernel.h). > > > > Since I use efi_acpi_table to store the allocated pages pointer which > are used to store newly created ACPI and EFI tables. > See [PATCH v3 40/62]: > + order = get_order_from_bytes(d->arch.efi_acpi_len); > + d->arch.efi_acpi_table = alloc_xenheap_pages(order, 0); > > And it free these pages when destroying this domain: > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > + free_xenheap_pages(d->arch.efi_acpi_table, > + get_order_from_bytes(d->arch.efi_acpi_len)); > +#endif > > efi_acpi_gpa might not need. If you need to free the memory at domain destruction, it could make sense to store the pointer in struct arch_domain, even if it only happens for dom0. However you could come up with a single struct and add a pointer to it in arch_domain to limit the per-domain overhead. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |