Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 01/17] VT-d Posted-intterrupt (PI) design

["Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Wu, Feng
> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 4:43 PM
> 
> 
> diff --git a/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt b/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f9b4637
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,329 @@
> +Authors: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) design for XEN
> +
> +Background
> +==========
> +With the development of virtualization, there are more and more device
> +assignment requirements. However, today when a VM is running with
> +assigned devices (such as, NIC), external interrupt handling for the assigned
> +devices always needs VMM intervention.
> +
> +VT-d Posted-interrupt is a more enhanced method to handle interrupts
> +in the virtualization environment. Interrupt posting is the process by
> +which an interrupt request is recorded in a memory-resident
> +posted-interrupt-descriptor structure by the root-complex, followed by
> +an optional notification event issued to the CPU complex.

Some clarification required here. Is "Interrupt Posting" only used to
represent the process of VT-d Posted-interrupt, or also for CPU-side
posting through IPI? From above context, and later explanation about
"Processor Support" and "Root-complex Support", looks the former
is true. Then how do we call CPU-side posting?

I think a one-sentence definition about those terms in the start would
be helpful.

> +
> +With VT-d Posted-interrupt we can get the following advantages:
> +- Direct delivery of external interrupts to running vCPUs without VMM
> +intervention
> +- Decrease the interrupt migration complexity. On vCPU migration, software
> +can atomically co-migrate all interrupts targeting the migrating vCPU. For
> +virtual machines with assigned devices, migrating a vCPU across pCPUs
> +either incurs the overhead of forwarding interrupts in software (e.g. via VMM
> +generated IPIs), or complexity to independently migrate each interrupt 
> targeting
> +the vCPU to the new pCPU. However, after enabling VT-d PI, the destination 
> vCPU
> +of an external interrupt from assigned devices is stored in the IRTE (i.e.
> +Posted-interrupt Descriptor Address), when vCPU is migrated to another pCPU,
> +we will set this new pCPU in the 'NDST' filed of Posted-interrupt 
> descriptor, this
> +make the interrupt migration automatic.
> +
> +Here is what Xen currently does for external interrupts from assigned 
> devices:
> +
> +When a VM is running and an external interrupt from an assigned device occurs
> +for it. VM-EXIT happens, then:
> +
> +vmx_do_extint() --> do_IRQ() --> __do_IRQ_guest() --> hvm_do_IRQ_dpci() -->
> +raise_softirq_for(pirq_dpci) --> raise_softirq(HVM_DPCI_SOFTIRQ)
> +
> +softirq HVM_DPCI_SOFTIRQ is bound to dpci_softirq()
> +
> +dpci_softirq() --> hvm_dirq_assist() --> vmsi_deliver_pirq() --> 
> vmsi_deliver() -->
> +vmsi_inj_irq() --> vlapic_set_irq()
> +
> +vlapic_set_irq() does the following things:
> +1. If CPU-side posted-interrupt is supported, call vmx_deliver_posted_intr() 
> to deliver
> +the virtual interrupt via posted-interrupt infrastructure.
> +2. Else if CPU-side posted-interrupt is not supported, set the related vIRR 
> in vLAPIC
> +page and call vcpu_kick() to kick the related vCPU. Before VM-Entry, 
> vmx_intr_assist()
> +will help to inject the interrupt to guests.
> +
> +However, after VT-d PI is supported, when a guest is running in non-root and 
> an
> +external interrupt from an assigned device occurs for it. No VM-Exit is 
> needed,

". No VM-Exit ..." -> ", no VM-Exit..."

> +the guest can handle this totally in non-root mode, thus avoiding all the 
> above
> +code flow.
> +
> +Posted-interrupt Introduction
> +========================
> +There are two components to the Posted-interrupt architecture:

"to the" -> "in the"


Thanks
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel