[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: use masking operation instead of test_bit for MCSF bits
This is a follow of commit 90f2e2a307fc6a6258c39cc87b3b2bf9441c0fa7 "use masking operation instead of test_bit for MCSF bits" where the ARM changes were missing. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c index 880d0a6..1b0f9eb 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void hypercall_cancel_continuation(void) struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); struct mc_state *mcs = ¤t->mc_state; - if ( test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags) ) + if ( mcs->flags & MCSF_in_multicall ) { __clear_bit(_MCSF_call_preempted, &mcs->flags); } @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ unsigned long hypercall_create_continuation( va_start(args, format); - if ( test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags) ) + if ( mcs->flags & MCSF_in_multicall ) { __set_bit(_MCSF_call_preempted, &mcs->flags); -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |