[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/62] Add ACPI support for arm64 on Xen
On 18/11/15 08:03, Shannon Zhao wrote: > On 2015/11/17 19:52, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Shannon, >> >> On 17/11/15 09:39, shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> This patch set adds ACPI support for arm64 on Xen. The design document >>> could be found from [1]. >> >> Thank you for your work on it. I think this series would benefits to be >> split in smaller series. >> >> I would do a first series which split DT code from common code. So we >> can get this code as soon as possible in Xen, avoid you to spend less >> time rebasing your us to be spammed with 62 patches for each new version. >> > > Sure, I think I can split this patch set in three parts. > > First one would be porting the necessary Linux changes of ACPI 5.0~6.0. > It includes: > > ACPI 5.0: Add new/changed tables to headers (only changes of Generic > Interrupt and Generic Distributor and some changes already exist) > ACPICA/ARM: ACPI 5.1: Update for MADT changes. > ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for MADT table. > ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add values for MADT GIC version field > ACPICA/ARM: ACPI 5.1: Update for FADT changes. > ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for FADT table > ACPICA/ARM: ACPI 5.1: Update for GTDT table changes. > ACPICA: Headers: Add GTDT flag definitions for the timer subtable. > ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add support for STAO table > > Second one as you suggest would be the series which split DT codes from > common code. > > And the last one would be the series which add ACPI support for Xen on > ARM and prepare the necessary things for Dom0. > > How about this way? The order of the first and second can be changed if > you like. I'm fine with either way. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |