[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] xen/hvm: introduce a fpu_uninitialised field to the CPU save record
>>> On 18.11.15 at 12:00, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As for the problem at hand, I don't see what was wrong with v1. > > Fundamentally, we have three different variations of the same structure; > two of which require special compat handling. Pretending otherwise is > just silly. And if we gain a few more additions, we'll end up with half a dozen slightly different structure declarations in the public interface? If you consider the first step (adding tsc_aux) a mistake, let's not repeat the same mistake again (even if right now it might _seem_ to be reasonable to some of us). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |