[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.4 test] 64297: regressions - FAIL
On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 12:06 +0000, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 64297 linux-3.4 real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64297/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 baroque0 > Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsmÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 baroque0 > Âtest-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 baroque0 > Âtest-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intelÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 baroque0 (getting a bit bored now ;-) > Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsmÂÂ6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 62277 baroque1 (woo!) > Âtest-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 baroque1 > Âtest-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intelÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 baroque1 > Âtest-amd64-i386-xlÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpuÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-xsmÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 > Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. > 62277 Lets just assume these are all baroque* From: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/baroque0.html http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/baroque1.html it is pretty clear that baroque* have a problem with booting Linux 3.4. I can see jobs which have passed xen-boot on Linux 3.10 onwards. In: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64297/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel/serial-baroque1.log Nov 16 05:07:47.093012 Configuring network interfaces...interface eth0 does not exist! [...] Nov 16 05:09:09.117011 Starting web server: apache2apache2: apr_sockaddr_info_get() failed for baroque1 Nov 16 05:09:49.345119 apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName Nov 16 05:09:49.353021 . And no sign of a network device. In a flight with a newer kernel I see: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64435/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel/serial-baroque0.log Nov 17 04:12:13.113030 [ÂÂÂÂ4.292477] igb: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 5.0.5-k Nov 17 04:12:13.121018 [ÂÂÂÂ4.292486] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2013 Intel Corporation. Nov 17 04:12:13.129030 [ÂÂÂÂ4.292587] Already setup the GSI :17 Nov 17 04:12:13.129063 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320655] igb 0000:02:00.0: added PHC on eth0 Nov 17 04:12:13.137036 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320659] igb 0000:02:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection Nov 17 04:12:13.145028 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320662] igb 0000:02:00.0: eth0: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) 00:1e:67:af:e4:34 Nov 17 04:12:13.153112 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320706] igb 0000:02:00.0: eth0: PBA No: 102100-000 Nov 17 04:12:13.161188 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320709] igb 0000:02:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 4 rx queue(s), 4 tx queue(s) Nov 17 04:12:13.169206 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320779] Already setup the GSI :18 Nov 17 04:12:13.169238 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347944] igb 0000:03:00.0: added PHC on eth1 Nov 17 04:12:13.177019 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347947] igb 0000:03:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection Nov 17 04:12:13.185021 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347950] igb 0000:03:00.0: eth1: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) 00:1e:67:af:e4:35 Nov 17 04:12:13.193025 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347994] igb 0000:03:00.0: eth1: PBA No: 102100-000 Nov 17 04:12:13.201014 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347996] igb 0000:03:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 4 rx queue(s), 4 tx queue(s) And in http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64435/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel/baroque0-output-lspci_-vvv 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 03) Which is the same device as Huxelrebe* has (according to <1441877560.24450.365.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>) Therefore I think it would be appropriate to set host flag LinuxKernelMin = 3.5 on Baroque*. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |