[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]
>>> On 16.11.15 at 17:00, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: > regressions - > FAIL [and 1 more messages]"): >> I wonder how easy it would be to filter out the wrong advertisement, >> during outgoing migration, in the toolstack in 4.2. I appreciate that >> 4.2 is long-dead. So maybe we should just leave it. Users can shut >> down and restart their guests. > > For now I think the easiest fix is: > > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.3-testing test] 64287: regressions - > FAIL"): >> flight 64287 xen-4.3-testing real [real] >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64287/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> including tests which could not be run: >> test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. >> vs. 63212 > > Based on this, which is the only regression in 64287, we could force > push this: > >> version targeted for testing: >> xen fd1e4cc4d1d100337931b6f6dc50ed0b9766968a >> baseline version: >> xen 85ca813ec23c5a60680e4a13777dad530065902b >> >> Last test of basis 63212 2015-10-22 10:03:01 Z 24 days >> Failing since 63360 2015-10-29 13:39:04 Z 17 days 12 attempts >> Testing same since 64090 2015-11-10 18:01:42 Z 5 days 3 attempts Well, yes, but wouldn't it re-occur once it managed to run on an Intel box again? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |