[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/7] xen/arm: introduce HYPERVISOR_platform_op on arm and arm64
On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 18:10 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > I agree with your point (I thought about it myself) but the current > assembly scheme for hypercalls doesn't work well with that. I would have > to introduce, and maintain going forward, two special hypercall > implementations in assembly, one for arm and another for arm64, just to > set interface_version. I don't think it is worth it; I prefer to have to > maintain the explicit interface_version setting at the call sites (that > today is just one). You could give the bare assembly stub a different name (append _core or _raw or something) and make HYPERVISOR_platform_op a C wrapper for it which DTRT. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |