[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 11.11.15 at 12:25, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 03:58 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 10.11.15 at 18:59, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > flight 63948 xen-4.3-testing real [real] >> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63948/ >> > >> > Regressions :-( >> > >> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> > including tests which could not be run: >> > test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail >> > REGR. vs. 63212 >> >> This having failed for quite some time, I've finally looked more closely >> and found >> >> Nov 10 14:36:16.949051 (XEN) vmce.c:88: PV restore: unsupported MCA >> capabilities 0x1000802 for d1:v0 (supported: 0) >> >> to be the reason for the EPERM here >> >> xc: error: Couldn't set extended vcpu0 info (1 = Operation not >> permitted): Internal error >> >> Taking apart the value, it is MCG_SER_P | MCG_TES_P (the low 8 bits >> get masked out anyway), which is in line with 4.2's GUEST_MCG_CAP. >> Hence I would guess that previous successful runs of this test would >> have been on Intel systems only; I can't see how this test would ever >> succeed on AMD ones. > > FWIW you can find the history of any given test at a URL like: > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64 > -migrupgrade/xen-4.3-testing.html > > Figuring out the arch of the machines is a bit of a faff, especially since > some of the relevant logs no longer exist. From > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/huxelrebe0.html > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/godello0.html > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/pinot0.html > > I found recent logs which confirm (via the serial log): > Huxelrebe: > CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1225 v3 @ 3.20GHz stepping 03 > Godello: > CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 v3 @ 3.10GHz stepping 03 > Pinot: > CPU0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 3350 HE stepping 00 > > With Huxelrebe passing and godello and pinot failing this doesn't seem to > correlate with your investigation though. Looking at that history page you point me to, I see passes on godello. >> Considering that 4.3 is out of maintenance, I >> think the only reasonable change to avoid endless failure here is to >> limit this test to Intel systems for this version. > > Aside from the above I don't think osstest is currently aware of the vendor > of the processors (although I can certainly think of several reasons it > should be). > > But given this is a new test case I would be happy, I think, to restrict it > to only go back as far as the earliest release which was in maintenance at > the time the test was introduced (August this year), or maybe (if something > just dropped out of maintenance recently) just the ones maintained today > (since it took a while for the test case to "bed in" and be made working on > some of the older ones). FWIW the last related fix I see in osstest was > early October. That would be fine too. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |