Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 5/5] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/11/15 11:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>  static void xen_percpu_init(void)
>>>  {
>>>     struct vcpu_register_vcpu_info info;
>>> @@ -104,6 +120,8 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
>>>     BUG_ON(err);
>>>     per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
>>>  
>>> +   xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
>>
>> Does the runstate memory area get unregsitered when a kernel tears
>> things down, or is kexec somehow inhibited for xen guests?
>>
>> i couldn't spot either happening, but I may have missed it.
> 
> I don't think that the runstate memory area needs to be unregistered for
> kexec, but I am not very knowledgeble on kexec and Xen, CC'ing Vitaly
> and David.

There's a whole pile of other state needing to be reset for kexec (event
channels and grant tables for example).  The guest needs to soft reset
itself (available in Xen 4.6) before kexec'ing another kernel.

This soft reset would also including cleaning up this shared memory region.

David


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel