|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/9] x86/intel_pstate: add a booting param to select the driver to load
On 23/10/2015 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.10.15 at 10:18, <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 07/10/2015 23:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 14.09.15 at 04:32, <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> >> > @@ -647,9 +648,11 @@ static int __init cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> >> > int ret = 0;
> >> >
> >> > if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> >> > - (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL))
> >> > - ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver);
> >> > - else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> >> > + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)) {
> >> > + ret = intel_pstate_init();
> >> > + if (ret)
> >> > + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver);
> >> > + } else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> >> > (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD))
> >> > ret = powernow_register_driver();
> >>
> >> Since you're basically modifying the entire body of the function,
> >> please
> > gets its
> >> coding style corrected as you fiddle with it.
> >
> > Ok, I guess you was probably referring to the remaining lines in the
> > function - "(boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD))".. Will
> > align them as well.
>
> No, I'm not just talking about alignment. And the coding style of the file is
> mixed
> already (see e.g. the following function, which admittedly has even more
> blanks
> than needed), so getting this function into proper shape since you modify it
> in its
> entirety is a step in the right direction.
>
Ok. I will use Xen style brackets for this function.
Best,
Wei
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |