Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 4/4] README.bisection: New consumer-oriented document

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 4/4] README.bisection: New 
consumer-oriented document"):
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:15:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > +         |       url used for fetching the bits
> > +    |
> > +         ` Identifier indicating the purpose for which the tree
> > +      is used.
> 
> A tab was inserted here.

Thanks, will fix.

> > +Progress Reports
...
> > +These contain the roughly same information; instead of "complete" they
> > +may say "running", "inconclusive", "unreproducible", etc.
> 
> On xen-devel there are only "complete" emails. It might be helpful to
> send "unreproducible" and / or "inconclusive" emails as well? What I'm
> thinking is that it would be helpful to clearly indicate human
> intervention is needed.

There's quite a lot of these.  In principle, around one for each
"REGR" ever mentioned in a main push gate flight report.

I don't think anyone wants to read them routinely.  I certainly don't.
If one is interested in a particular failure, it's easy enough to go
into the list and find the right one.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel