Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen 4.6 Acknowledgements

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

> On 9 Oct 2015, at 11:08, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 10:57 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> I could also include qemu-traditional into (3), which I have not
>>>> counted
>>>> in the past. So I was thinking I'd not do this. 
>>> 
>>> qemu-traditional doesn't get much traffic, but I don't see a reason to
>>> exclude it. The separation/change you are proposing here sounds like an
>>> ideal point to reintroduce it where it wasn't included before. 
>> 
>> That's what I was thinking and why I left it out
> 
> I was proposing leaving it in based on that reasoning though.
> 
> (did you mean this to be below the comment about upstream?).

Correct

Lars

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel