Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 62616: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 05.10.15 at 11:29, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 17:46 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 62616 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62616/ 
>> 
>> Regressions :-(
>> 
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 62389 
>> REGR. vs. 60727
> 
> According to 
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/all-branch-statuses.txt 
>  this has been blocked for a while now.
> 
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386- 
> xl-qemuu-win7-amd64/xen-4.4-testing.html
> suggests that there is an intermittent failure of the various migration
> jobs here and always has been. We've just been unlucky that it has been
> hitting different specific test steps and therefore not triggering the
> heisenbug compensator. I expect it will do so eventually.
> 
> FWIW 
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-x 
> l-qemuu-win7-amd64/xen-4.5-testing.html
> shows a much lower incidence in 4.5 and
> 
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386 
> -xl-qemuu-win7-amd64/xen-4.6-testing.html looks pretty good (although not
> much data) but http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/ 
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64/xen-unstable.html looks good too so
> that is encouraging.
> 
> We could maybe force push, which I only consider because as I mentioned in
> an earlier mail there is a fix in this batch which will unwedge the qemu
> -upstream-4.4-testing flights too.

Agreed, I think we should force push here.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel