Re: [Xen-devel] [v4][PATCH 2/2] libxl: introduce gfx_passthru_kind

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:30 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn't suffice
> after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
> type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass IGD. Actually
> this means we can benefit this to support other specific devices just
> by extending gfx_passthru_kind. And then we can cooperate with
> gfx_passthru to address IGD cases as follows:
> 
>     gfx_passthru = 0    => sets build_info.u.gfx_passthru to false
>     gfx_passthru = 1    => sets build_info.u.gfx_passthru to true and
>                            build_info.u.gfx_passthru_kind to DEFAULT
>     gfx_passthru = "igd"    => sets build_info.u.gfx_passthru to true
>                                and build_info.u.gfx_passthru_kind to IGD
> 
> Here if gfx_passthru_kind = DEFAULT, we will call
> libxl__is_igd_vga_passthru() to check if we're hitting that table to need
> to pass that option to qemu. But if gfx_passthru_kind = "igd" we always
> force to pass that.
> 
> And "-gfx_passthru" is just introduced to work for qemu-xen-traditional
> so we should get this away from libxl__build_device_model_args_new() in
> the case of qemu upstream.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked + applied both patches, thanks.

Stefano -- are the QEMU side patches in qemu-upstream-unstable.git yet? If
not I suppose this is a call/reminder to backport them from mainline or
whatever.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel