Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 29/33] make-flight: Provide xen-unstable-smoke branch

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 18:37 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This contains a very limited set of jobs
>     test-amd64-amd64-libvirt
>     test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386
>     test-armhf-armhf-xl
> and the builds they depend on.
> 
> The debianhvm job exists only in this flight, and is generated by
> having branch_debianhvm_arch return i386 instead of amd64.  This is so
> that this branch contains a 32-bit x86 guest as well as a 64-bit one.
> 
> We override host allocator parameters to make this flight not care
> about host stickiness: it just takes whatever comes to hand.  These
> runvars are marked `synth' so that cs-bisection-step and
> cs-adjust-flight do not copy them, as discussed in previous patches.

Didn't you drop it from those previous patches with the intention of moving
it here?

Everything else looks good.

> Later we will arrange to reuse previous builds for the build artefacts
> which aren't intended subjects of the smoke test.
> 
> (Deployment note: This needs images/debian-7.2.0-i386-CD-1.iso which I
> have already placed in the Cambridge and Xen Project instances.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Generate all the jobs that this flight's tests use, and add
>     note about this to the commit message.
>     Mention `synth'-ness of hostalloc runvars in commit message.
>     Image is in Xen Project test colo too.
> ---
>  make-flight |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/make-flight b/make-flight
> index 13674b8..c1f40b9 100755
> --- a/make-flight
> +++ b/make-flight
> @@ -34,8 +34,28 @@ flight=`./cs-flight-create $blessing $branch`
>  defsuite=`getconfig DebianSuite`
>  defguestsuite=`getconfig GuestDebianSuite`
>  
> +case "$branch" in
> +xen-unstable-smoke)
> +     global_runvars+=" hostalloc_maxbonus_variation~=0 "
> +     global_runvars+=" hostalloc_bonus_previousfail~=0 "
> +        ;;
> +esac
> +
>  job_create_build_filter_callback () {
> -    :
> +  local job=$1; shift
> +  case "$branch" in
> +    xen-unstable-smoke)
> +      case "$job" in
> +        build-amd64)         ;;
> +        build-amd64-pvops)   ;;
> +        build-amd64-libvirt) ;;
> +        build-armhf)         ;;
> +        build-armhf-pvops)   ;;
> +        *)                   return 1 ;;
> +      esac
> +    ;;
> +  esac
> +  return 0
>  }
>  
>  if [ x$buildflight = x ]; then
> @@ -56,6 +76,14 @@ job_create_test_filter_callback () {
>    local dom0arch=$1; shift
>  
>    case "$branch" in
> +    xen-unstable-smoke)
> +      case "$job" in
> +        test-amd64-amd64-libvirt)                  return 0 ;;
> +        test-armhf-armhf-xl)                       return 0 ;;
> +        test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386)  return 0 ;;
> +        *)                                         return 1 ;;
> +      esac
> +      ;;
>      qemu-upstream-4.2-testing)
>        case " $* " in
>          *" device_model_version=qemu-xen "*)
> @@ -222,6 +250,7 @@ do_hvm_win7_x64_tests () {
>  
>  branch_debianhvm_arch () {
>    case $branch in
> +    xen-unstable-smoke) echo i386;;
>      *) echo amd64;;
>    esac
>  }

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel