|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 61839: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 62015: regressions
- FAIL"):
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 62015:
> regressions - FAIL"):
> > This has failed twice in a row on xen-4.6-testing, in 61839 and here. The
> > bisector already had a go at the initial failure, but concluded
> > unreproducible as shown by the yellow box in
> >
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-4.6-testing/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.debian-hvm-install.html
>
> In our call earlier I disagreed but I hadn't seen this email so hadn't
> considered this bisection point.
>
> I agree that this justifies a force push. I will make it so.
I have force pushed this:
osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 62015: regressions -
FAIL"):
> flight 62015 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62015/
...
> version targeted for testing:
> xen 70d63e48077f8fee8eda6d8d95eeda52a34d9077
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |