Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 60971: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

osstest service owner writes ("[xen-unstable test] 60971: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 60971 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60971/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 18 guest-start.2 fail REGR. vs. 
> 60878

osstest service owner writes ("[xen-unstable test] 61059: regressions - FAIL"):
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  build-armhf-xsm               5 xen-build           fail REGR. vs. 60878
>  build-armhf-libvirt           5 libvirt-build         fail REGR. vs. 60878
> 
> Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 18 guest-start.2 fail in 60971 pass 
> in 61059

osstest's search for an appropriate set of justifications for each
failure was not sophisticated enough to see that this combination
justifies a push.  (It would have seen this if the failures were in
the other order.)

> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  801ab48e5556cb54f67e3cb57f077f47e8663ced
> baseline version:
>  xen                  7b99717f62caeac08eea224a177cd28f047ac4b5
> 
> Last test of basis    60878  2015-08-25 19:28:24 Z    6 days
> Testing same since    60971  2015-08-28 17:10:33 Z    3 days    2 attempts

I have just, therefore, force pushed
801ab48e5556cb54f67e3cb57f077f47e8663ced.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel