Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 5

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 31.08.15 at 13:31, <zhaoshenglong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2015/8/31 17:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 31.08.15 at 10:51, <zhaoshenglong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> (I wonder why you didn't get this if you have a glance at the booting
>>> process. uefi_init(arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c of Linux) -->
>>> efi_config_parse_tables --> match_config_table. It will save the
>>> VenderTable to efi.acpi20 and when Linux call acpi_os_get_root_pointer
>>> to get ACPI root address, it will return efi.acpi20)
>> 
>> See above - if I hadn't realized you, in every single place you use it,
>> really mean "the VendorTable field of the Configuration Table entry
>> using ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID", I would have complained here again.
>> (Of course you don't need to spell it this way every time, but you
>> should imo spell it this or a similar way at least once in each section.)
> 
> So you can't get the meaning of "the value of VendorTable in EFI
> Configuration Table"?

Without proper context, VendorTable to me refers to a table, not
the field of a particular table's slot.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel