[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 08/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add virtual ITS commands support
Hi Vijay, On 27/07/15 12:11, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add Virtual ITS command processing support to Virtual ITS driver > > Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v5: - Rename vgic_its_*() to vits_*() The changelog seems very small compared to the amount of discussion we had on v4. > v4: - Use helper function to read from command queue > - Add MOVALL > - Removed check for entry in device in domain RB-tree > --- > xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c | 392 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h | 13 ++ > 2 files changed, 405 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c > index 60f8332..dfa3435 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c > @@ -30,8 +30,27 @@ > #include <asm/gic.h> > #include <asm/vgic.h> > #include <asm/gic-its.h> > +#include <asm/atomic.h> > #include <xen/log2.h> > > +#define DEBUG_ITS As said on v4, you should directly do "// #define DEBUG_ITS" rather than changing this line again in patch #10. > + > +#ifdef DEBUG_ITS > +# define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) dprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, fmt, ##args) > +#else > +# define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) do {} while ( 0 ) > +#endif > + > +#ifdef DEBUG_ITS > +static void dump_cmd(its_cmd_block *cmd) > +{ > + printk("VITS:CMD[0] = 0x%lx CMD[1] = 0x%lx CMD[2] = 0x%lx CMD[3] = > 0x%lx\n", > + cmd->bits[0], cmd->bits[1], cmd->bits[2], cmd->bits[3]); > +} > +#else > +static void dump_cmd(its_cmd_block *cmd) { do {} while ( 0 ); } The do {} while (0) is not necessary in > +#endif [..] > +static int vits_process_mapvi(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + struct vitt entry; > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > + uint8_t vcol_id, cmd; > + uint32_t vid, dev_id, event; > + > + vcol_id = virt_cmd->mapvi.col; > + vid = virt_cmd->mapvi.phy_id; > + cmd = virt_cmd->mapvi.cmd; > + dev_id = virt_cmd->mapvi.devid; > + > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: MAPVI: dev 0x%"PRIx32" vcol %"PRId32" vid > %"PRId32"\n", You are using the wrong PRI* for vcol. It's an uint8_t not int32_t. If PRIu8 doesn't exist please introduce it. I'm sure I will miss some in all the patches. Please review all the PRId32 you added and use the correct one. [..] > +static int vits_process_movi(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + struct vitt entry; > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > + uint32_t dev_id, event; > + uint8_t vcol_id; > + > + vcol_id = virt_cmd->movi.col; > + event = virt_cmd->movi.event; > + dev_id = virt_cmd->movi.devid; > + > + DPRINTK("%pv vITS: MOVI: dev_id 0x%"PRIx32" vcol %"PRId32" event > %"PRId32"\n", vcol PRIu8 event PRIu32 [..] > +static int vits_process_clear(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + /* Ignored */ > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: CLEAR: dev_id 0x%"PRIx32" id %"PRId32"\n", id PRIu32 > + v, virt_cmd->clear.devid, virt_cmd->clear.event); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int vits_process_invall(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + /* Ignored */ > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: INVALL: vCID %"PRId32"\n", v, virt_cmd->invall.col); vCID PRIu8 > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int vits_process_int(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + uint32_t event, dev_id ; > + > + event = virt_cmd->int_cmd.cmd; > + dev_id = virt_cmd->int_cmd.devid; > + > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: INT: Device 0x%"PRIx32" id %"PRId32"\n", id PRIu32 > + v, dev_id, event); > + > + /* TODO: Inject LPI */ Done in a follow-up patch I guess? > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int vits_add_device(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > + struct vdevice_table dt_entry; > + uint32_t dev_id = virt_cmd->mapd.devid; > + > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS:Add dev 0x%"PRIx32" ipa = 0x%"PRIx64" size > %"PRId32"\n", size PRIu32 [..] > +static int vits_process_mapc(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + uint8_t vcol_id; > + uint64_t vta = 0; > + > + vcol_id = virt_cmd->mapc.col; > + vta = virt_cmd->mapc.ta; > + > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: MAPC: vCID %"PRId32" vTA 0x%"PRIx64" valid > %"PRId32"\n", > + v, vcol_id, vta, virt_cmd->mapc.valid); > + On v4, I only asked to do the check on vta only when the mapc.valid = 1. The one the collection ID should not have been dropped. Without it a malicious guest can provide an invalid collection ID which will result to access outside the array and may crash Xen. So please re-add this check. [..] > +static int vits_read_virt_cmd(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits, > + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd) > +{ > + paddr_t maddr; > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > + int ret; > + > + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&vits->lock)); > + > + if ( !(vits->cmd_base & GITS_CBASER_VALID) ) > + { > + dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, "%pv: vITS: Invalid CBASER\n", v); > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* CMD Q can be more than 1 page. Map only page that is required */ "Map only the page..." > + maddr = (vits->cmd_base & MASK_4K) + atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read); > + > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: Mapping CMD Q maddr 0x%"PRIx64" read 0x%"PRIx32"\n", > + v, maddr, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read)); > + > + ret = vits_access_guest_table(d, maddr, (void *)virt_cmd, > + sizeof(its_cmd_block), 0); > + if ( ret ) > + { > + dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, > + "%pv: vITS: Failed to get command page @page 0x%"PRIx32"\n", > + v, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read)); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* No command queue is created by vits to check on Q full */ > + atomic_add(sizeof(its_cmd_block), &vits->cmd_read); > + if ( atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read) == vits->cmd_qsize ) > + { > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: Reset read @ 0x%"PRIx32" qsize 0x%"PRIx64"\n", > + v, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read), vits->cmd_qsize); > + > + atomic_set(&vits->cmd_read, 0); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int vits_process_cmd(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits) Either put a static, if not use outside this file, or add the declaration in the header. > +{ > + its_cmd_block virt_cmd; > + > + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&vits->lock)); > + > + do { > + if ( vits_read_virt_cmd(v, vits, &virt_cmd) ) > + goto err; > + if ( vits_parse_its_command(v, vits, &virt_cmd) ) > + goto err; > + } while ( vits->cmd_write != atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read) ); > + > + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: read @ 0x%"PRIx32" write @ 0x%"PRIx64"\n", > + v, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read), > + vits->cmd_write); > + > + return 1; > +err: > + dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, "%pv: vITS: Failed to process guest cmd\n", v); > + domain_crash_synchronous(); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int vits_domain_init(struct domain *d) Ditto. > +{ > + struct vgic_its *vits; > + int i; > + > + d->arch.vgic.vits = xzalloc(struct vgic_its); > + if ( !d->arch.vgic.vits ) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + vits = d->arch.vgic.vits; > + > + spin_lock_init(&vits->lock); > + > + vits->collections = xzalloc_array(struct its_collection, nr_cpu_ids); The number of collection for a domain is based on the number of VCPUs owned by him (see d->max_vcpus). Furthermore, you are allocating to few collection, the number of collection should at least be max_vcpus + 1. You've introduced vits_get_max_collections in a latter patch (see #10). Please use it here. > + if ( !vits->collections ) > + { > + xfree(d->arch.vgic.vits); > + return -ENOMEM; It's not neccesary to take care of free what you allocated here. When a domain is destroyed the domain_vgic_free will be called to free everything correctly. Although that means that you need to introduce a vits_domain_free, which is in anycase mandatory. I'd like to see it within this patch. > + } > + > + for ( i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++ ) > + vits->collections[i].target_address = ~0UL; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /* > * Local variables: > * mode: C > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h > index 66be53a..cdb786c 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ > #include <asm/gic_v3_defs.h> > #include <xen/rbtree.h> > > +#define MASK_4K 0xfffffffff000UL If you name the macro MASK_4K this should go in xen/sizes.h and not in the gic-its.h. Although on v4 [1], Ian suggested to rename into GITS_CBASER_PA_MASK which IHMO would be better. Regards, Regards, [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg03032.html -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |