|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 08/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add virtual ITS commands support
Hi Vijay,
On 27/07/15 12:11, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add Virtual ITS command processing support to Virtual ITS driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v5: - Rename vgic_its_*() to vits_*()
The changelog seems very small compared to the amount of discussion we
had on v4.
> v4: - Use helper function to read from command queue
> - Add MOVALL
> - Removed check for entry in device in domain RB-tree
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c | 392
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h | 13 ++
> 2 files changed, 405 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
> index 60f8332..dfa3435 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,27 @@
> #include <asm/gic.h>
> #include <asm/vgic.h>
> #include <asm/gic-its.h>
> +#include <asm/atomic.h>
> #include <xen/log2.h>
>
> +#define DEBUG_ITS
As said on v4, you should directly do "// #define DEBUG_ITS" rather than
changing this line again in patch #10.
> +
> +#ifdef DEBUG_ITS
> +# define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) dprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, fmt, ##args)
> +#else
> +# define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) do {} while ( 0 )
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef DEBUG_ITS
> +static void dump_cmd(its_cmd_block *cmd)
> +{
> + printk("VITS:CMD[0] = 0x%lx CMD[1] = 0x%lx CMD[2] = 0x%lx CMD[3] =
> 0x%lx\n",
> + cmd->bits[0], cmd->bits[1], cmd->bits[2], cmd->bits[3]);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void dump_cmd(its_cmd_block *cmd) { do {} while ( 0 ); }
The do {} while (0) is not necessary in
> +#endif
[..]
> +static int vits_process_mapvi(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + struct vitt entry;
> + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> + uint8_t vcol_id, cmd;
> + uint32_t vid, dev_id, event;
> +
> + vcol_id = virt_cmd->mapvi.col;
> + vid = virt_cmd->mapvi.phy_id;
> + cmd = virt_cmd->mapvi.cmd;
> + dev_id = virt_cmd->mapvi.devid;
> +
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: MAPVI: dev 0x%"PRIx32" vcol %"PRId32" vid
> %"PRId32"\n",
You are using the wrong PRI* for vcol. It's an uint8_t not int32_t. If
PRIu8 doesn't exist please introduce it.
I'm sure I will miss some in all the patches. Please review all the
PRId32 you added and use the correct one.
[..]
> +static int vits_process_movi(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + struct vitt entry;
> + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> + uint32_t dev_id, event;
> + uint8_t vcol_id;
> +
> + vcol_id = virt_cmd->movi.col;
> + event = virt_cmd->movi.event;
> + dev_id = virt_cmd->movi.devid;
> +
> + DPRINTK("%pv vITS: MOVI: dev_id 0x%"PRIx32" vcol %"PRId32" event
> %"PRId32"\n",
vcol PRIu8
event PRIu32
[..]
> +static int vits_process_clear(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + /* Ignored */
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: CLEAR: dev_id 0x%"PRIx32" id %"PRId32"\n",
id PRIu32
> + v, virt_cmd->clear.devid, virt_cmd->clear.event);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vits_process_invall(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + /* Ignored */
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: INVALL: vCID %"PRId32"\n", v, virt_cmd->invall.col);
vCID PRIu8
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vits_process_int(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + uint32_t event, dev_id ;
> +
> + event = virt_cmd->int_cmd.cmd;
> + dev_id = virt_cmd->int_cmd.devid;
> +
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: INT: Device 0x%"PRIx32" id %"PRId32"\n",
id PRIu32
> + v, dev_id, event);
> +
> + /* TODO: Inject LPI */
Done in a follow-up patch I guess?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vits_add_device(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> + struct vdevice_table dt_entry;
> + uint32_t dev_id = virt_cmd->mapd.devid;
> +
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS:Add dev 0x%"PRIx32" ipa = 0x%"PRIx64" size
> %"PRId32"\n",
size PRIu32
[..]
> +static int vits_process_mapc(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + uint8_t vcol_id;
> + uint64_t vta = 0;
> +
> + vcol_id = virt_cmd->mapc.col;
> + vta = virt_cmd->mapc.ta;
> +
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: MAPC: vCID %"PRId32" vTA 0x%"PRIx64" valid
> %"PRId32"\n",
> + v, vcol_id, vta, virt_cmd->mapc.valid);
> +
On v4, I only asked to do the check on vta only when the mapc.valid = 1.
The one the collection ID should not have been dropped. Without it a
malicious guest can provide an invalid collection ID which will result
to access outside the array and may crash Xen.
So please re-add this check.
[..]
> +static int vits_read_virt_cmd(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits,
> + its_cmd_block *virt_cmd)
> +{
> + paddr_t maddr;
> + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&vits->lock));
> +
> + if ( !(vits->cmd_base & GITS_CBASER_VALID) )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, "%pv: vITS: Invalid CBASER\n", v);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* CMD Q can be more than 1 page. Map only page that is required */
"Map only the page..."
> + maddr = (vits->cmd_base & MASK_4K) + atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read);
> +
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: Mapping CMD Q maddr 0x%"PRIx64" read 0x%"PRIx32"\n",
> + v, maddr, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read));
> +
> + ret = vits_access_guest_table(d, maddr, (void *)virt_cmd,
> + sizeof(its_cmd_block), 0);
> + if ( ret )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR,
> + "%pv: vITS: Failed to get command page @page 0x%"PRIx32"\n",
> + v, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* No command queue is created by vits to check on Q full */
> + atomic_add(sizeof(its_cmd_block), &vits->cmd_read);
> + if ( atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read) == vits->cmd_qsize )
> + {
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: Reset read @ 0x%"PRIx32" qsize 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
> + v, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read), vits->cmd_qsize);
> +
> + atomic_set(&vits->cmd_read, 0);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int vits_process_cmd(struct vcpu *v, struct vgic_its *vits)
Either put a static, if not use outside this file, or add the
declaration in the header.
> +{
> + its_cmd_block virt_cmd;
> +
> + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&vits->lock));
> +
> + do {
> + if ( vits_read_virt_cmd(v, vits, &virt_cmd) )
> + goto err;
> + if ( vits_parse_its_command(v, vits, &virt_cmd) )
> + goto err;
> + } while ( vits->cmd_write != atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read) );
> +
> + DPRINTK("%pv: vITS: read @ 0x%"PRIx32" write @ 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
> + v, atomic_read(&vits->cmd_read),
> + vits->cmd_write);
> +
> + return 1;
> +err:
> + dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, "%pv: vITS: Failed to process guest cmd\n", v);
> + domain_crash_synchronous();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int vits_domain_init(struct domain *d)
Ditto.
> +{
> + struct vgic_its *vits;
> + int i;
> +
> + d->arch.vgic.vits = xzalloc(struct vgic_its);
> + if ( !d->arch.vgic.vits )
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + vits = d->arch.vgic.vits;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&vits->lock);
> +
> + vits->collections = xzalloc_array(struct its_collection, nr_cpu_ids);
The number of collection for a domain is based on the number of VCPUs
owned by him (see d->max_vcpus).
Furthermore, you are allocating to few collection, the number of
collection should at least be max_vcpus + 1.
You've introduced vits_get_max_collections in a latter patch (see #10).
Please use it here.
> + if ( !vits->collections )
> + {
> + xfree(d->arch.vgic.vits);
> + return -ENOMEM;
It's not neccesary to take care of free what you allocated here. When a
domain is destroyed the domain_vgic_free will be called to free
everything correctly.
Although that means that you need to introduce a vits_domain_free, which
is in anycase mandatory. I'd like to see it within this patch.
> + }
> +
> + for ( i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++ )
> + vits->collections[i].target_address = ~0UL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Local variables:
> * mode: C
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
> index 66be53a..cdb786c 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> #include <asm/gic_v3_defs.h>
> #include <xen/rbtree.h>
>
> +#define MASK_4K 0xfffffffff000UL
If you name the macro MASK_4K this should go in xen/sizes.h and not in
the gic-its.h. Although on v4 [1], Ian suggested to rename into
GITS_CBASER_PA_MASK which IHMO would be better.
Regards,
Regards,
[1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg03032.html
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |