[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 59908: regressions - FAIL
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:34:34PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 16:15 +0000, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 59908 qemu-mainline real [real] > > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1u4kwl1o3Dc6FDtVhFHrYLmyppwmEL8O6TSGGkDPdNzjeTSjZl_GhmvpBKlKsBPNbIlSfLqlqdopz-VgXgkCmm0eXivzV7hDeVfWv9mkXQPnQ3spzegDYYVfh9iHBe-wMTmd3XUQxuatfoS10LGCgDxQSm8sKxRqO4rlyNLAnRT8/http%3A%2F%2Flogs.test-lab.xenproject.org%2Fosstest%2Flogs%2F59908%2F > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. > > vs. 59059 > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 guest-saverestore fail > > REGR. vs. 59059 > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. > > vs. 59059 > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. > > vs. 59059 > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 guest-saverestore fail > > REGR. vs. 59059 > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. > > 59059 > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/qemu-mainline/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64.guest-saverestore.html > > was almost complete before the bisector decided to go off on test-amd64 > -i386-freebsd10-i386.guest-saverestore instead for some reason. > > All it missed was the final confirmation of the last pass, but from the > logs it was just about to blame: > > commit df4b1024526cae3479da3492d6371fd4a7324a03 > Author: Juan Quintela <quintela@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Oct 8 10:58:10 2014 +0200 > > migration: create new section to store global state > > This includes a new section that for now just stores the current qemu > state. > > Right now, there are only one way to control what is the state of the > target after migration. > > - If you run the target qemu with -S, it would start stopped. > - If you run the target qemu without -S, it would run just after > migration finishes. > > The problem here is what happens if we start the target without -S and > there happens one error during migration that puts current state as > -EIO. Migration would ends (notice that the error happend doing block > IO, network IO, i.e. nothing related with migration), and when > migration finish, we would just "continue" running on destination, > probably hanging the guest/corruption data, whatever. > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Perhaps we need to prod some new thing during the migration now? (Or > fix this non-backwards compat change maybe) I've look at it, and I'm going to send fixes for this changes and another changes that also breaks migration: commit 61964c23e5ddd5a33f15699e45ce126f879e3e33 migration: Add configuration section Thanks, -- Anthony PERARD _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |