[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.6 v2 7/8] python/xc: reinstate original implementation of next_bdf
I missed the fact that next_bdf is used to parsed user supplied strings when reviewing. The user supplied string is a NULL-terminated string separated by comma. User can supply several PCI devices in that string. There is, however, no delimiter for different devices, hence we can't change the syntax of that string. This patch reinstate the original implementation of next_bdf to preserve the original syntax. The last argument for xc_assign_device is always 0. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Cc: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> Tiejun, are you actually using this python binding? I don't think we have in tree user. If nobody is using it, I propose we remove this binding in next release. I don't have live example of that string. My analysis is based on reverse-engineering of original code. --- tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c | 30 ++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c index c8380d1..2c36eb2 100644 --- a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c +++ b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c @@ -592,8 +592,7 @@ static int token_value(char *token) return strtol(token, NULL, 16); } -static int next_bdf(char **str, int *seg, int *bus, int *dev, int *func, - int *flag) +static int next_bdf(char **str, int *seg, int *bus, int *dev, int *func) { char *token; @@ -608,17 +607,8 @@ static int next_bdf(char **str, int *seg, int *bus, int *dev, int *func, *dev = token_value(token); token = strchr(token, ',') + 1; *func = token_value(token); - token = strchr(token, ',') + 1; - if ( token ) { - *flag = token_value(token); - *str = token + 1; - } - else - { - /* O means we take "strict" as our default policy. */ - *flag = 0; - *str = NULL; - } + token = strchr(token, ','); + *str = token ? token + 1 : NULL; return 1; } @@ -630,14 +620,14 @@ static PyObject *pyxc_test_assign_device(XcObject *self, uint32_t dom; char *pci_str; int32_t sbdf = 0; - int seg, bus, dev, func, flag; + int seg, bus, dev, func; static char *kwd_list[] = { "domid", "pci", NULL }; if ( !PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "is", kwd_list, &dom, &pci_str) ) return NULL; - while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func, &flag) ) + while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func) ) { sbdf = seg << 16; sbdf |= (bus & 0xff) << 8; @@ -663,21 +653,21 @@ static PyObject *pyxc_assign_device(XcObject *self, uint32_t dom; char *pci_str; int32_t sbdf = 0; - int seg, bus, dev, func, flag; + int seg, bus, dev, func; static char *kwd_list[] = { "domid", "pci", NULL }; if ( !PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "is", kwd_list, &dom, &pci_str) ) return NULL; - while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func, &flag) ) + while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func) ) { sbdf = seg << 16; sbdf |= (bus & 0xff) << 8; sbdf |= (dev & 0x1f) << 3; sbdf |= (func & 0x7); - if ( xc_assign_device(self->xc_handle, dom, sbdf, flag) != 0 ) + if ( xc_assign_device(self->xc_handle, dom, sbdf, 0) != 0 ) { if (errno == ENOSYS) sbdf = -1; @@ -696,14 +686,14 @@ static PyObject *pyxc_deassign_device(XcObject *self, uint32_t dom; char *pci_str; int32_t sbdf = 0; - int seg, bus, dev, func, flag; + int seg, bus, dev, func; static char *kwd_list[] = { "domid", "pci", NULL }; if ( !PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "is", kwd_list, &dom, &pci_str) ) return NULL; - while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func, &flag) ) + while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func) ) { sbdf = seg << 16; sbdf |= (bus & 0xff) << 8; -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |