|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 05/11] x86/intel_pstate: relocate the driver register function
On 24/07/2015 21:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.06.15 at 13:16, <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Register the CPU hotplug notifier when the driver is registered, and
> > move the driver register function to the cpufreq.c.
>
> At the very least this ought to be merged with the previous patch.
>
> > --- a/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -630,10 +630,18 @@ static struct notifier_block cpu_nfb = {
> > .notifier_call = cpu_callback
> > };
> >
> > -static int __init cpufreq_presmp_init(void)
> > +int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
> > {
> > + if (!driver_data || !driver_data->init ||
> > + !driver_data->verify || !driver_data->exit ||
> > + (!driver_data->target == !driver_data->setpolicy))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (cpufreq_driver)
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > + cpufreq_driver = driver_data;
> > +
> > register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -presmp_initcall(cpufreq_presmp_init);
>
> But then the code is left inconsistent: When will the notifier be called for
> all
> the CPUs that are already up?
Since I will keep the cpufreq_presmp_init() there,
register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb) will be called in the presmp function there.
Best,
Wei
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |