[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 05/11] x86/intel_pstate: relocate the driver register function
On 24/07/2015 21:36, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 25.06.15 at 13:16, <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Register the CPU hotplug notifier when the driver is registered, and > > move the driver register function to the cpufreq.c. > > At the very least this ought to be merged with the previous patch. > > > --- a/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > +++ b/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > @@ -630,10 +630,18 @@ static struct notifier_block cpu_nfb = { > > .notifier_call = cpu_callback > > }; > > > > -static int __init cpufreq_presmp_init(void) > > +int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data) > > { > > + if (!driver_data || !driver_data->init || > > + !driver_data->verify || !driver_data->exit || > > + (!driver_data->target == !driver_data->setpolicy)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (cpufreq_driver) > > + return -EBUSY; > > + > > + cpufreq_driver = driver_data; > > + > > register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb); > > return 0; > > } > > -presmp_initcall(cpufreq_presmp_init); > > But then the code is left inconsistent: When will the notifier be called for > all > the CPUs that are already up? Since I will keep the cpufreq_presmp_init() there, register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb) will be called in the presmp function there. Best, Wei _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |