Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST] Arrange to test migration from the previous Xen version

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Arrange to test migration from the 
previous Xen version"):
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 14:55 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Maybe these patterns should be "xen-" ?  In case someone invents a
> > tree `xenblargle'.
> > 
> > Hrm, I see you took the example of ap-print-url, cri-common and
> > mfi-common.
> 
> Shall I get out my yakk scissors?

If you feel like it that would be nice :-).

> > There is some nascent stuff in my smoke branch which might help with
> > this.  It's not suitable for public consumption.
> 
> I think we could do without it for now?

Yes.  Maybe you want to remove the "xxx" and turn it into "todo" or
something.

> > > +        # XXX I think this doesn't break bisecting over the old
> > > +        # versions, since the bisectory will set tree_* based on what
> > > +        # was actually built, not based on this set of vars.
> > 
> > You are correct.
> 
> Super. I shall s/XXX I think t/T/ in the next version. Or shall I drop the
> paragraph?

Yes.

> I'll fix "bisectory" too

I quite liked it.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel