[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v10][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: Try to avoid placing BARs in RMRRs
On 07/20/2015 03:06 PM, Chen, Tiejun wrote: >>>> +/* Find the lowest RMRR higher than base. */ >>>> +static int find_next_rmrr(uint32_t base) >>>> +{ >>>> + unsigned int i; >>>> + int next_rmrr = -1; >>>> + uint64_t min_base = (1ull << 32); >>>> + >>>> + for ( i = 0; i < memory_map.nr_map ; i++ ) >>>> + { >>>> + if ( memory_map.map[i].type == E820_RESERVED && >>>> + memory_map.map[i].addr > base && >>>> + memory_map.map[i].addr < min_base ) >>>> + { >>>> + next_rmrr = i; >>>> + min_base = memory_map.map[i].addr; >>>> + } >>>> + } >>>> + return next_rmrr; >>>> +} >>> >>> Considering _both_ callers, I think the function should actually return >>> the lowest RMRR higher than or equal to base. >> >> You mean instead of strictly greater than the base. >> >>> Or wait - we actually >>> need to find the lowest RMRR the _end_ of which is higher than base. >> >> Yes, you're right: there's always a risk that pci_mem_start will *start* >> in the middle of a range. Looking for the next *end* is more robust. >> > > Sorry this is not very clear to me so are you saying something like this? > > for ( i = 0; i < memory_map.nr_map ; i++ ) > { > end = memory_map.map[i].addr + memory_map.map[i].size; > > if ( memory_map.map[i].type == E820_RESERVED && > end > base && > memory_map.map[i].addr < min_base ) > { > next_rmrr = i; > min_base = memory_map.map[i].addr; > } > } I think replace min_base with min_end: if ( memory_map.map[i].type == E820_RESERVED && end > base && end < min_end ) { next_rmrr = i; min_end = end; } Hmm... although I suppose that doesn't catch the possibility of a memory range crossing the 4G boundary. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |