[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v7][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: skip reserved ranges
>>> On 15.07.15 at 13:05, <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 15.07.15 at 10:59, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> What about this? >>> >>> @@ -301,6 +301,19 @@ void pci_setup(void) >>> pci_mem_start <<= 1; >>> } >>> >>> + for ( i = 0; i < memory_map.nr_map ; i++ ) >>> + { >>> + uint64_t reserved_start, reserved_size; >>> + reserved_start = memory_map.map[i].addr; >>> + reserved_size = memory_map.map[i].size; >>> + if ( check_overlap(pci_mem_start, pci_mem_end - pci_mem_start, >>> + reserved_start, reserved_size) ) >>> + { >>> + printf("Reserved device memory conflicts current PCI >>> memory.\n"); >>> + BUG(); >>> + } >>> + } >> >> So what would the cure be if someone ran into this BUG() (other >> than removing the device associated with the conflicting RMRR)? >> Afaics such a guest would remain permanently unbootable, which >> of course is not an option. > > Is not booting worse than what we have now -- which is, booting > successfully but (probably) having issues due to MMIO ranges > overlapping RMRRs? Again a matter of perspective: For devices (USB!) where the RMRR exists solely for boot time (or outdated OS) use, this would be a plain regression. For the graphics device Tiejun needs this for, it of course would make little difference, I agree. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |