Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] util/grub.d/20_linux_xen.in: Add arm64 support

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:41:28AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 06:53 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > > +if [ "x$machine" != xaarch64 ]; then
> > > + multiboot_cmd="multiboot"
> > > + module_cmd="module"

And we should use the grub-file --is-multiboot2 to figure out if the
Xen binary can also do that - and use multiboot2 protocol.

But that patch I can cobble after this one is done.

> > > +else
> > > + multiboot_cmd="xen_hypervisor"
> > > + module_cmd="xen_module"
> > > +fi
> > > +
> > 
> > Strictly speaking, this is boot-time decision. As mentioned by
> > Vladimir, better would be to provide alias xen_hypervisor and
> > xen_module in multiboot for platforms supporting Xen (is MIPS really
> > supported?) and use it consistently.
> 
> I had been thinking of this the other way around, e.g. on platforms
> which support Xen but not multiboot1 "multiboot" would be added as an
> alias for xen_hypervisor.
> 
> However so long as grub-mkconfig (via 20_linux_xen) work for everyone
> and that peoples existing hand-crafted x86/multiboot/Xen grub.cfg's
> continue to work then I think having the alias go either way would be
> fine.
> 
> BTW I had been going to suggest a function at the grub.cfg level which
> dispatched to the correct command, but I suppose an actual alias is
> better.
> 
> Ian.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel