[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 3/3] xen/vm_event: Deny register writes if refused by vm_event reply
>>> On 14.07.15 at 15:45, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/14/2015 03:35 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 13.07.15 at 19:14, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/vm_event.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/vm_event.c >>> @@ -22,11 +22,19 @@ >>> >>> #include <xen/sched.h> >>> #include <asm/hvm/hvm.h> >>> +#include <asm/vm_event.h> >>> >>> int vm_event_init_domain(struct domain *d) >>> { >>> struct vcpu *v; >>> >>> + if ( !d->arch.event_write_data ) >>> + d->arch.event_write_data = xzalloc_array(struct monitor_write_data, >>> + d->max_vcpus); >> >> Looking at this again I wonder why the data isn't being made part of >> struct arch_vcpu's vm_event sub-structure. That would also address >> the complaint I have here about this not being a guaranteed maximum >> page size runtime allocation. > > I think this is just how the initial suggestion was worded, I'll change it. Right - after having sent the reply I started wondering whether maybe I had asked for this. But if I did, then surely not with xzalloc_array(), but vzalloc(). If you moved this into struct arch_vcpu (again), then its size would likely call for the whole vm_event structure to become indirectly accessed and allocated. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |