[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Deadlock in stdvga_mem_accept() with emulation
Hello, I'm battling the following hypervisor crash with current staging: (d2) Invoking ROMBIOS ... (XEN) stdvga.c:147:d2v0 entering stdvga and caching modes (d2) VGABios $Id: vgabios.c,v 1.67 2008/01/27 09:44:12 vruppert Exp $ (XEN) Watchdog timer detects that CPU7 is stuck! (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.6-unstable x86_64 debug=y Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 7 (XEN) RIP: e008:[<ffff82d08012c3f1>] _spin_lock+0x31/0x54 (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000202 CONTEXT: hypervisor (d2v0) (XEN) rax: 000000000000c11d rbx: ffff83041e687970 rcx: 000000000000c11e (XEN) rdx: ffff83041e687970 rsi: 000000000000c11e rdi: ffff83041e687978 (XEN) rbp: ffff83040eb37208 rsp: ffff83040eb37200 r8: 0000000000000000 (XEN) r9: 0000000000000000 r10: ffff82d08028c3c0 r11: 0000000000000000 (XEN) r12: ffff83041e687000 r13: ffff83041e687970 r14: ffff83040eb37278 (XEN) r15: 00000000000c253f cr0: 000000008005003b cr4: 00000000001526e0 (XEN) cr3: 00000004054a0000 cr2: 0000000000000000 (XEN) ds: 0000 es: 0000 fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: 0000 cs: e008 (XEN) Xen stack trace from rsp=ffff83040eb37200: (XEN) ffff83040eb37278 ffff83040eb37238 ffff82d0801d09b6 0000000000000282 (XEN) 0000000000000008 ffff830403791bf0 ffff83041e687000 ffff83040eb37268 (XEN) ffff82d0801cb23a 00000000000c253f ffff8300d85fc000 0000000000000001 (XEN) 00000000000000c2 ffff83040eb37298 ffff82d0801cb410 00000000000c253f (XEN) 0000000000000000 0000000100000001 0100000000000000 ffff83040eb37328 (XEN) ffff82d0801c2403 ffff83040eb37394 ffff83040eb30000 0000000000000000 (XEN) ffff83040eb37360 00000000000000c2 ffff8304054cb000 000000000000053f (XEN) 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 ffff83040eb373f4 00000000000000c2 (XEN) ffff83040eb373d8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff82d08028c620 (XEN) 0000000000000000 ffff83040eb37338 ffff82d0801c3e5d ffff83040eb37398 (XEN) ffff82d0801cb107 000000010eb37394 ffff830403791bf0 ffff830403791bf0 (XEN) ffff83041e687000 ffff83040eb37398 ffff830403791bf0 0000000000000001 (XEN) ffff83040eb373d8 0000000000000001 00000000000c253f ffff83040eb373c8 (XEN) ffff82d0801cb291 ffff83040eb37b30 ffff8300d85fc000 0000000000000001 (XEN) 0000000000000000 ffff83040eb37428 ffff82d0801bb440 00000000000a0001 (XEN) 00000000000c253f 0000000100000001 0111000000000000 ffff83040eb37478 (XEN) 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 (XEN) 0000000000000001 ffff83040eb374a8 ffff82d0801bc0b9 0000000000000001 (XEN) 00000000000c253f ffff8300d85fc000 00000000000a0001 0100000000000000 (XEN) ffff83040eb37728 ffff82e00819dc60 0000000000000000 ffff83040eb374c8 (XEN) Xen call trace: (XEN) [<ffff82d08012c3f1>] _spin_lock+0x31/0x54 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801d09b6>] stdvga_mem_accept+0x3b/0x125 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801cb23a>] hvm_find_io_handler+0x68/0x8a (XEN) [<ffff82d0801cb410>] hvm_mmio_internal+0x37/0x67 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801c2403>] __hvm_copy+0xe9/0x37d (XEN) [<ffff82d0801c3e5d>] hvm_copy_from_guest_phys+0x14/0x16 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801cb107>] hvm_process_io_intercept+0x10b/0x1d6 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801cb291>] hvm_io_intercept+0x35/0x5b (XEN) [<ffff82d0801bb440>] hvmemul_do_io+0x1ff/0x2c1 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801bc0b9>] hvmemul_do_io_addr+0x117/0x163 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801bc129>] hvmemul_do_mmio_addr+0x24/0x26 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801bcbb5>] hvmemul_rep_movs+0x1ef/0x335 (XEN) [<ffff82d080198b49>] x86_emulate+0x56c9/0x13088 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801bbd26>] _hvm_emulate_one+0x186/0x281 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801bc1e8>] hvm_emulate_one+0x10/0x12 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801cb63e>] handle_mmio+0x54/0xd2 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801cb700>] handle_mmio_with_translation+0x44/0x46 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801c27f6>] hvm_hap_nested_page_fault+0x15f/0x589 (XEN) [<ffff82d0801e9741>] vmx_vmexit_handler+0x150e/0x188d (XEN) [<ffff82d0801ee7d1>] vmx_asm_vmexit_handler+0x41/0xc0 (XEN) (XEN) (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) Panic on CPU 7: (XEN) FATAL TRAP: vector = 2 (nmi) (XEN) [error_code=0000] (XEN) **************************************** At first I thought it was caused by V5 of the vm_event-based introspection series, but I've rolled it back enough to apply V4 on top of it (which has been thoroughly tested on Thursday), and it still happens, so this would at least appear to be unrelated at this point (other than the fact that our use case is maybe somewhat unusual with heavy emulation). I'll keep digging, but since this is a busy time for Xen I thought I'd issue a heads-up here as soon as possible, in case the problem is obvious for somebody and it helps getting it fixed sooner. Thanks, Razvan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |