[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v3 09/15] vt-d: Extend struct iremap_entry to support VT-d Posted-Interrupts
>>> On 24.06.15 at 07:18, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.h > @@ -289,29 +289,43 @@ struct dma_pte { > /* interrupt remap entry */ > struct iremap_entry { > union { > - u64 lo_val; > + struct { u64 lo, hi; }; > struct { > - u64 p : 1, > + u16 p : 1, > fpd : 1, > dm : 1, > rh : 1, > tm : 1, > dlm : 3, > avail : 4, > - res_1 : 4, > - vector : 8, > - res_2 : 8, > - dst : 32; > - }lo; > - }; > - union { > - u64 hi_val; > + res_1 : 4; > + u8 vector; > + u8 res_2; > + u32 dst; > + u16 sid; > + u16 sq : 2, > + svt : 2, > + res_3 : 12; > + u32 res_4 : 32; > + } remap; > struct { > - u64 sid : 16, > - sq : 2, > + u16 p : 1, > + fpd : 1, > + res_1 : 6, > + avail : 4, > + res_2 : 2, > + urg : 1, > + im : 1; > + u8 vector; > + u8 res_3; > + u32 res_4 : 6, > + pda_l : 26; > + u16 sid; > + u16 sq : 2, > svt : 2, > - res_1 : 44; > - }hi; > + res_5 : 12; > + u32 pda_h; > + } post; > }; > }; Considering that various of the fields are identical between the two formats I wonder whether that shouldn't be presented in the layout here: sid, svt, sq, vector could all be a single structure field, with other parts becoming sub-unions. Or would that cause problems elsewhere? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |