|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 08/16] x86/hvm: unify stdvga mmio intercept with standard mmio intercept
>>> On 03.07.15 at 18:25, <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -int stdvga_intercept_mmio(ioreq_t *p)
> +static bool_t stdvga_mem_accept(const struct hvm_io_handler *handler,
> + const ioreq_t *p)
> {
> - struct domain *d = current->domain;
> - struct hvm_hw_stdvga *s = &d->arch.hvm_domain.stdvga;
> - uint64_t start, end, count = p->count, size = p->size;
> - int buf = 0, rc;
> -
> - if ( p->df )
> - {
> - start = (p->addr - (count - 1) * size);
> - end = p->addr + size;
> - }
> - else
> - {
> - start = p->addr;
> - end = p->addr + count * size;
> - }
> -
> - if ( (start < VGA_MEM_BASE) || (end > (VGA_MEM_BASE + VGA_MEM_SIZE)) )
> - return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
> -
> - if ( p->size > 8 )
> - {
> - gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "invalid mmio size %d\n", (int)p->size);
> - return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
> - }
> + struct hvm_hw_stdvga *s = ¤t->domain->arch.hvm_domain.stdvga;
>
> spin_lock(&s->lock);
>
> - if ( s->stdvga && s->cache )
> + if ( !s->stdvga ||
> + (p->addr < VGA_MEM_BASE) ||
> + ((p->addr + p->size) > (VGA_MEM_BASE + VGA_MEM_SIZE)) )
> + goto reject;
I came here just to check whether you make use of the earlier
added hvm_mmio_{first,last}_byte(), but found that you're ignoring
p->df now altogether. That can't be right?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |