Re: [Xen-devel] [v5][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 17:06 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:

> #2. Don't expose "ignore" to user and just keep "host" as the default
> 
> He told me he would discuss this with you, but sounds he didn't do this, 
> or I'm missing something here?

My question was regarding how xl rdm="type=none" differed from not
saying anything (i.e. getting the default). You explained that this was
useful to allow the default to be changed, which I agreed with.

The question regarding the actually naming of the options at either the
xl level or the libxl (which seems to be what Ian J's comments were on)
are orthogonal to the question of whether there should be a way to
explicitly ask for the default (as opposed to implicitly asking for it
by omission of the option).

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel