[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/pvh: Handle hypercalls for 32b PVH guests
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:54:48 -0400
- Cc: elena.ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxx, wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:55:17 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 07/07/2015 05:20 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.06.15 at 22:21, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@@ -4929,6 +4928,27 @@ static hvm_hypercall_t *const
pvh_hypercall64_table[NR_hypercalls] = {
[ __HYPERVISOR_arch_1 ] = (hvm_hypercall_t *)paging_domctl_continuation
};
+extern void compat_mmuext_op(void); /* XXX: need proper declaration */
No XXX like this please. Just add a suitable declaration. And in fact
adding it here (with correct arguments, and without the comment)
would seem quite fine to me.
The XXX here was meant for eliciting comments from reviewers ;-)
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
