Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Use system blktap

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 15:24 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/07/2015 03:21 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:51 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> >> George Dunlap (6): 
> >>   libxl: Make local_initiate_attach more rational
> >>   libxl: Remove linux udev rules
> >>   tools: Add a block-tap script for setting up tapdisks via tap-ctl
> >>   libxl: Use the block-tap script for LIBXL_DISK_BACKEND_TAP
> >>   tools: Remove in-tree blktap2
> >>   libxl: Add more logging to hotplug script path
> > 
> > Could some subset of this series safely go in now? I'm thinking in
> > particular of:
> >   libxl: Make local_initiate_attach more rational
> >   libxl: Add more logging to hotplug script path
> > 
> > Which look useful and standalone, assuming the first doesn't need any of
> > the rest.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if the udev stuff makes sense without the blktap script
> > stuff (which appears to need a little more discussion if nothing else).
> > I'll take it if you say it is safe to do so...
> 
> The first three can go in without any regressions,

ITYM the first two and sixth? i.e.

b1882a4 libxl: Make local_initiate_attach more rational
2ba368d libxl: Remove linux udev rules
eff228d libxl: Add more logging to hotplug script path

So that is what I'm in the middle of applying...

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel