Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code from xc_dom_allocate()

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code 
from xc_dom_allocate()"):
> I'd be ok with either leaving this as is (and tagging CID 1055188 as
> intentioanl) or adding the null initialiser as you suggested in your
> "However: "

I would be happy with either of those.

(I don't think the null initialiser would placate Coverity, but of
course our objective is to make the code right and Coverity is a tool
to help us do that - placating Coverity is not a goal in its own
right.)

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel