Re: [Xen-devel] [v4][PATCH 12/19] tools/libxl: passes rdm reservation policy

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > This is trying to covert LIBXL_XXX to XEN_XXX passed this policy as a
> > hypercall, so I still think this is better to live here. Instead, the
> > previous patch is just defining something.
> The entire rest of this patch is about xl.  It doesn't make any sense at
> all for the previous patch to modify libxl in a way that doesnt'
> actually do anything, and then in the current patch modify both xl and
> libxl.
Right.

> What if, for instance, someone had built their own toolstack on top of
> libxl, and wanted to backport just the xen/libxl parts of the RMRR
> series?  They'd have to backport this patch with the xl changes to get a
> functioning system, even though they aren't really using libxl.
So I will squash this into the previous patch as you suggested here.

Thanks
Tiejun

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel