Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: new maintainer for the RTDS scheduler

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 22:11 -0700, Meng Xu wrote:
> 2015-06-25 5:44 GMT-07:00 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Meng Xu <xumengpanda@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS |    5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 6b1068e..e6616d2 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -282,6 +282,11 @@ F: tools/libxl/libxl_nonetbuffer.c
> >  F:     tools/hotplug/Linux/remus-netbuf-setup
> >  F:     tools/hotplug/Linux/block-drbd-probe
> >
> > +RTDS SCHEDULER
> > +M:     Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +S:     Supported
> > +F:     xen/common/sched_rt.c
> 
> I'm not sure if the following response is correct and proper, just in
> case it is correct. :-)
> 
It does not hurt, for sure. :-)

There are many interpretations of how this tags should be used, and 100%
uniform consensus is hard to reach! :-P

In any case, as the one doing (or making others do) the most of the work
on this scheduler, my primary intent when Cc-ing you was to let you know
that this is (may be?) happening.

> Reviewed-and-Acked-by: Meng Xu <mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
This at least tell me that you're aware and happy about it. Maintainers
and committers will decide what to do with the tag (retain, ditch, adapt
them, etc).

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel