|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/9] libxl: use explicit error codes in libxl_ctx_alloc
Rob Hoes writes ("[PATCH RFC 4/9] libxl: use explicit error codes in
libxl_ctx_alloc"):
> Signed-off-by: Rob Hoes <rob.hoes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/libxl/libxl.c | 6 +++---
> tools/libxl/libxl_event.c | 2 +-
> tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> index a6eb2df..f622981 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int libxl_ctx_alloc(libxl_ctx **pctx, int version,
> LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR, "Failed to initialize mutex");
> free(ctx);
> ctx = 0;
> - rc = ERROR_FAIL;
> + rc = ERROR_LOCK_FAIL;
I commented about ERROR_LOCK_FAIL earlier.
I think really if the mutex initialisation failed everything is
doomed. You probably want to introduce
ERROR_LIBXL_PROCESS_SEEMS_TOTALLY_BUST
> ctx->xch = xc_interface_open(lg,lg,0);
> if (!ctx->xch) {
> LOGEV(ERROR, errno, "cannot open libxc handle");
> - rc = ERROR_FAIL; goto out;
> + rc = ERROR_XC_CONNECT; goto out;
...
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int libxl_ctx_alloc(libxl_ctx **pctx, int version,
> ctx->xsh = xs_domain_open();
> if (!ctx->xsh) {
> LOGEV(ERROR, errno, "cannot connect to xenstore");
> - rc = ERROR_FAIL; goto out;
> + rc = ERROR_XS_CONNECT; goto out;
Good.
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ int libxl__ctx_evtchn_init(libxl__gc *gc) {
> xce = xc_evtchn_open(CTX->lg, 0);
> if (!xce) {
> LOGE(ERROR,"cannot open libxc evtchn handle");
> - rc = ERROR_FAIL;
> + rc = ERROR_XC_CONNECT;
If you're going to distinguish XS from XC, you probably want to
distinguish xce too. It's a different /dev node.
If we're categorising errors these are "installation or permissions
problem".
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |