Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 9/9] libxl: introduce specific error codes in libxl_device_nic_add

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rob Hoes writes ("[PATCH RFC 9/9] libxl: introduce specific error codes in 
libxl_device_nic_add"):
> Signed-off-by: Rob Hoes <rob.hoes@xxxxxxxxxx>
...    
> +    # NIC parameters could not be determined
> +    (ENUM_PREV, "NIC_SCRIPT_UNDETERMINED"),
> +    (ENUM_PREV, "NIC_DEVID_UNDETERMINED"),

Perhaps we could have a coherent naming scheme ?  These are invalid
parameter errors, aren't they ?  That is, libxl's caller specified
something wrong.

So maybe
  INVALID_NIC_SCRIPT_UNDETERMINED
?

What do others think ?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel