[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v1 00/13] Introduce HMV without dm and new boot ABI
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:55 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > I don't know if we should introduce a new name for this, but I wanted to > > point out that this is different from PVH from Xen point of view. In > > particular most of the outstanding PVH work items (32bit, AMD) on the > > hypervisor would be redudant if we get this to work, right? If that is > > the case, then I think it is best we agree on which road we want to take > > going forward as soon as possible to avoid duplicated or wasted efforts. > > I think what you are saying is we either want to pursue this path _or_ > PVH, but not both, and I would be inclined to agree, it seems to me like > duplication of both effort and functionality to do both. Right, especially given that they both seem to provide similar functionalities. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |