Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 58828: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:16 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 02:18 +0000, osstest service user wrote:
> > flight 58828 osstest real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/58828/
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  build-armhf                   3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. vs. 
> > 58726
> >  build-armhf-xsm               3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. vs. 
> > 58726
> >  build-armhf-pvops             3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. vs. 
> > 58726
> 
> Copy kernel 
> /home/tftp//osstest/debian-installer/armhf/2015-01-10-wheezy/backports.deb 
> failed: No such file or directory at Osstest/Debian.pm line 884.
> 
> Looks like I probably botched something in one of:
> 5dd4c52291b6 mg-debian-installer-update: updates to better handle Jessie 
> onwards.
> cdbe966bb86e More flexible handling of need-kernel-deb-$flavour host flag
> 
> I'll investigate.

So, the way I appear to have structured the backwards compatibility it
retains compatibility with the existing host props, but not with the
existing TftpDiVersion.

IOW mg-debian-installer-update-all should have been run while committing
"More flexible handling of need-kernel-deb-$flavour host flag", which I
seem to have forgotten to note anywhere -- although Ian J did do so in
response to v2.

I don't think handling compatibility with the layout of the existing
TftpDiVersion dir is going to be easy or worth it.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel