Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 27/27] tools/libxl: Drop all knowledge of toolstack callbacks

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 11:43 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/06/15 11:14, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 16:06 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 16/06/15 16:04, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 14:44 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>>> Libxl has now been fully adjusted not to need them.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> /me looks mournfully at the #28 shaped hole in this series which would
> >>> nuke all the migration v1 code from libxc :-)
> >> I was going to slip that into v2.  I didn't want to delay posting v1 for
> >> review, given the proximity of the 4.6 freeze.
> >>
> >> I think I will transcribe the description of the legacy protocol from
> >> xg_save_restore.h
> > That would be good, thanks.
> >
> >>  and code up the legacy protocol in python.
> > That would be above and beyond, but don't let me stop you ;-)
> 
> Well - it is currently coded up with magic numbers in the conversion
> script.  All I was planning to do was make some numbers less magic.

That does sound nice, thanks.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel