[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d async invalidation for Device-TLB.
>>> On 16.06.15 at 05:55, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Zhang, Yang wrote on June 16, 2015 11:07 AM >>> Jan Beulich wrote on 2015-06-15: >> >>>> On 13.06.15 at 16:44, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 12.06.15 at 14:47, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>>>> On 12.06.15 at 04:40, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> I tested it by a Myri-10G Dual-Protocol NIC, which is an ATS device. >> >>>> for an invalidation: >> >>>> By sync way, it takes about 1.4 ms. >> >>>> By async way, it takes about 4.3 ms. >> >> It is a typo for the time: should be 1.4 us and 4.3 us. >> > > yes, it is 1.4 us and 4.3 us. > Thanks. > > I also have tested iotlb sync and async invalidation. > For sync way: it takes about 3.2 us. > For async way: it takes about 5.3 us. That's _longer_ than in the ATS case. Is that realistic? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |