|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/6] gnttab: eliminate several explicit version checks
On 15/06/15 13:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> @@ -1977,10 +1969,6 @@ __acquire_grant_for_copy(
>
> read_lock(&rgt->lock);
>
> - if ( rgt->gt_version == 0 )
> - PIN_FAIL(gt_unlock_out, GNTST_general_error,
> - "remote grant table not ready\n");
> -
> if ( unlikely(gref >= nr_grant_entries(rgt)) )
> PIN_FAIL(gt_unlock_out, GNTST_bad_gntref,
> "Bad grant reference %ld\n", gref);
> @@ -2482,19 +2470,15 @@ gnttab_set_version(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARA
> change the version number, except for the first 8 entries which
> are allowed to be in use (xenstore/xenconsole keeps them mapped).
> (You need to change the version number for e.g. kexec.) */
> - if ( gt->gt_version != 0 )
> + for ( i = GNTTAB_NR_RESERVED_ENTRIES; i < nr_grant_entries(gt); i++ )
> {
> - for ( i = GNTTAB_NR_RESERVED_ENTRIES; i < nr_grant_entries(gt); i++ )
> + if ( read_atomic(&_active_entry(gt, i).pin) != 0 )
> {
> - if ( read_atomic(&_active_entry(gt, i).pin) != 0 )
> - {
> - gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,
> - "tried to change grant table version from %d to %d,
> but some grant entries still in use\n",
> - gt->gt_version,
> - op.version);
> - res = -EBUSY;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,
> + "tried to change grant table version from %d to %d, but
> some grant entries still in use\n",
> + gt->gt_version, op.version);
As you are moving this printf, both %d should be %u.
As for the main part of the change, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
<andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |