Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 15.06.15 at 10:57, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So 3/20 = 15% failure rate (fiano0: 1/11=9%; fiano1: 2/9=22%). Which is
> better than the ~50% seen at the start of this thread, so it is worth
> applying the ucode update I think (and it would have been regardless the
> right thing to do), 
> 
> I do think a 15-20% failure rate might be worthy of further
> investigation by Intel too, since the failure rate with no-apicv was
> 1/13 = 7% (fiano0: 1/7=14%, fiano1: 0/6=0%), although those numbers are
> less significant due to fewer runs.

I fully agree; even the remaining 7% should be looked into, provided
they can be reproduced by them on sufficiently similar hardware.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel